{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Catalyst Consulting","provider_url":"https:\/\/catalystlegal.com\/fr\/","author_name":"Denis Lessard","author_url":"https:\/\/catalystlegal.com\/fr\/author\/denislessard\/","title":"Risk Aversion in Retaining External Counsel - Catalyst Consulting","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"O8WPhktuv3\"><a href=\"https:\/\/catalystlegal.com\/fr\/risk-aversion-in-retaining-external-counsel\/\">Risk Aversion in Retaining External Counsel<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/catalystlegal.com\/fr\/risk-aversion-in-retaining-external-counsel\/embed\/#?secret=O8WPhktuv3\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Risk Aversion in Retaining External Counsel\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; Catalyst Consulting\" data-secret=\"O8WPhktuv3\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/catalystlegal.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Les pratiques op\u00e9rationnelles floues, ind\u00e9pendantes et peu rentables des services juridiques pour s\u00e9lectionner les cabinets d\u2019avocats sont moins tenables qu\u2019elles ne l\u2019\u00e9taient il y a dix ans. Les services juridiques doivent appliquer des crit\u00e8res rigoureux lors de la s\u00e9lection des cabinets d\u2019avocats et commencer en stabilisant et r\u00e9duisant le nombre de cabinets. Une estimation des besoins anticip\u00e9s sur trois ans pour chaque sp\u00e9cialit\u00e9, suivie d'accords de partenariat pluriannuels avec les cabinets principaux, constitue une bonne base. Un cabinet juridique peut \u00eatre s\u00e9lectionn\u00e9 comme fournisseur unique ou s\u00e9lectionn\u00e9 apr\u00e8s un processus concurrentiel. Comme toujours, le service, les r\u00e9sultats et les prix doivent \u00eatre \u00e9quilibr\u00e9s."}